On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:56:57 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:33:45AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:10:23 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
> > > on VFIO devices op
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:33:45AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:10:23 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
> > on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
> > vfio_container_ioctl
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:10:23 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
> on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
> vfio_container_ioctl(). That's a poorly designed interface with unclear
> semantics about exactl
At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
vfio_container_ioctl(). That's a poorly designed interface with unclear
semantics about exactly what can be operated on.
In particular it operates on a single
