On 12/07/2015 02:34 PM, David Gibson wrote:
Currently, the versioned spapr machine types put the machine type version
into the description string. PC does not do this, using just the name
itself to distinguish. Doing the same lets us move setting the description
into the common base class, simp
On 07/12/15 04:34, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently, the versioned spapr machine types put the machine type version
> into the description string. PC does not do this, using just the name
> itself to distinguish. Doing the same lets us move setting the description
> into the common base class, sim
Currently, the versioned spapr machine types put the machine type version
into the description string. PC does not do this, using just the name
itself to distinguish. Doing the same lets us move setting the description
into the common base class, simplifying the code slightly.
Signed-off-by: Dav
