On 23.12.14 01:16, David Gibson wrote:
> At the moment, the PAPR RTC implementation (actually a paravirt
> firmware interface, rather than a normal device) works directly off
> host time, and so doesn't respect the options such as clock=vm which
> can be specified in the -rtc command line option.
At the moment, the PAPR RTC implementation (actually a paravirt
firmware interface, rather than a normal device) works directly off
host time, and so doesn't respect the options such as clock=vm which
can be specified in the -rtc command line option.
Extending the PAPR RTC in this way makes it cle