On 11/11/2014 01:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 10/11/2014 21:11, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 11/10/2014 07:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 10/11/2014 16:52, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
After a reset ESP_TCHI should contain the unique ID
of the chip. This value will be overwritten
On 10/11/2014 21:11, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 07:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 10/11/2014 16:52, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> After a reset ESP_TCHI should contain the unique ID
>>> of the chip. This value will be overwritten with the
>>> current tranfer count if the transfer coun
On 11/10/2014 07:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/11/2014 16:52, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> After a reset ESP_TCHI should contain the unique ID
>> of the chip. This value will be overwritten with the
>> current tranfer count if the transfer count has
>> previously been set.
>> So we should always
On 10/11/2014 16:52, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> After a reset ESP_TCHI should contain the unique ID
> of the chip. This value will be overwritten with the
> current tranfer count if the transfer count has
> previously been set.
> So we should always return the chip id if ESP_TCHI
> has never been wri
After a reset ESP_TCHI should contain the unique ID
of the chip. This value will be overwritten with the
current tranfer count if the transfer count has
previously been set.
So we should always return the chip id if ESP_TCHI
has never been written to.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
hw/scsi/e
