Eric Blake writes:
> On 10/19/2015 10:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> A future patch wants to change qapi union representation from
>>> an anonymous C union over to a named C union 'u', so that the
>>> C names of tag values are in a separate namespace and thus
>>> c
On 10/19/2015 10:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> A future patch wants to change qapi union representation from
>> an anonymous C union over to a named C union 'u', so that the
>> C names of tag values are in a separate namespace and thus
>> cannot collide with the C name
Eric Blake writes:
> A future patch wants to change qapi union representation from
> an anonymous C union over to a named C union 'u', so that the
> C names of tag values are in a separate namespace and thus
> cannot collide with the C names of non-variant QMP members.
> But for that to not cause
A future patch wants to change qapi union representation from
an anonymous C union over to a named C union 'u', so that the
C names of tag values are in a separate namespace and thus
cannot collide with the C names of non-variant QMP members.
But for that to not cause any problems with future exten
