On 10/13/2015 12:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> Rename alternate-clash to alternate-clash-members, and add a
>> new test alternate-clash-type. While similar to the earlier
>> addition of union-clash-type, we have one major difference: a
>> future patch will be simplify
Eric Blake writes:
> Rename alternate-clash to alternate-clash-members, and add a
> new test alternate-clash-type. While similar to the earlier
> addition of union-clash-type, we have one major difference: a
> future patch will be simplifying alternates to not need an
> implict AlternateKind enu
Rename alternate-clash to alternate-clash-members, and add a
new test alternate-clash-type. While similar to the earlier
addition of union-clash-type, we have one major difference: a
future patch will be simplifying alternates to not need an
implict AlternateKind enum, but we still need to detect