On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:03:19AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>On 14/09/15 06:14, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:36:08AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> The patchset depends on below Linux upstream commits:
>>>
>>> commit ed3e81f ("powerpc/eeh: Move PE state constants around")
>>>
On 14/09/15 06:14, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:36:08AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The patchset depends on below Linux upstream commits:
>>
>> commit ed3e81f ("powerpc/eeh: Move PE state constants around")
>> commit ec33d36 ("powerpc/eeh: Introduce eeh_pe_inject_err()")
>>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:36:08AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The patchset depends on below Linux upstream commits:
>
> commit ed3e81f ("powerpc/eeh: Move PE state constants around")
> commit ec33d36 ("powerpc/eeh: Introduce eeh_pe_inject_err()")
>
> According to PAPR specification 2.7, there
The patchset depends on below Linux upstream commits:
commit ed3e81f ("powerpc/eeh: Move PE state constants around")
commit ec33d36 ("powerpc/eeh: Introduce eeh_pe_inject_err()")
According to PAPR specification 2.7, there're 3 RTAS calls relevent to error
injection: "ibm,open-errinjct", "ibm,
