On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 01:36 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> It would be nicer if the guest had full control over the virtual
> address range of a PCI device.
It does ... within a HW window which can be different between P7 and
P8.
On P7 all PEs on a PHB share a single DMA address space that ge
On 06/06/2014 09:36 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 06.06.14 01:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/06/2014 02:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05.06.14 16:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05.06.14 15:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrot
On 06.06.14 01:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/06/2014 02:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 16:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 15:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14
On 06/06/2014 02:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.06.14 16:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 11:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05.06.14 15:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05.06.14 15:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrot
On 05.06.14 16:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 15:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 15:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14
On 06/05/2014 11:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.06.14 15:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 11:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05.06.14 15:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05.06.14 08:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrot
On 05.06.14 15:33, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 15:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 08:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
POWER
On 06/05/2014 11:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.06.14 15:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05.06.14 08:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TC
On 05.06.14 15:10, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.14 08:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability which allows allocating
TCE tables in the host ker
On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 05.06.14 08:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability which allows allocating
>>> TCE tables in the host kernel memory and handle H_PUT_TCE reque
On 05.06.14 08:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 06/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability which allows allocating
TCE tables in the host kernel memory and handle H_PUT_TCE requests
targeted to specific LIOBN (logical bus number) right
On 06/05/2014 03:49 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability which allows allocating
> TCE tables in the host kernel memory and handle H_PUT_TCE requests
> targeted to specific LIOBN (logical bus number) right in the host without
> switching to QEMU. At t
POWER KVM supports an KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE capability which allows allocating
TCE tables in the host kernel memory and handle H_PUT_TCE requests
targeted to specific LIOBN (logical bus number) right in the host without
switching to QEMU. At the moment this is used for emulated devices only
and the han
13 matches
Mail list logo