On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:57:34PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Will be easier to apply if this refactoring is a separate patch.
>
> Is someone doing anything conflicting in this area? (My answer: not
> that I know of).
Yes - I'm trying to refactor mmap-alloc, that's why I asked for this.
Con
]; Linhaifeng [haifeng@huawei.com]
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 03/24] util: add linux-only memfd fallback
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Will be easier to apply if this refactoring is a separate patch.
>
> Is someone doing anything conflicting in thi
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Will be easier to apply if this refactoring is a separate patch.
>
> Is someone doing anything conflicting in this area? (My answer: not
> that I know of).
so you mean that splitting over several lines isn't useful?
The main reason I did
On 02/10/2015 15:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:23:47PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/util/Makefile.objs b/util/Makefile.objs
>> index 372e037..9e05861 100644
>> --- a/util/Makefile.objs
>> +++ b/util/Makefile.objs
>> @@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
>> u
Hi
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:23:47PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> > diff --git a/util/Makefile.objs b/util/Makefile.objs
> > index 372e037..9e05861 100644
> > --- a/util/Makefile.objs
> > +++ b/util/Makefile.objs
> > @@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
> > util-obj-y
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:56:17AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:23:47PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > diff --git a/util/Makefile.objs b/util/Makefile.objs
> > > index 372e037..9e05861 100644
> > > --- a/util/
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:23:47PM +0200, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> diff --git a/util/Makefile.objs b/util/Makefile.objs
> index 372e037..9e05861 100644
> --- a/util/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/util/Makefile.objs
> @@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
> util-obj-y = osdep.o cutils.o unicode.o qemu-timer-common.
From: Marc-André Lureau
Implement memfd_create() fallback if not available in system libc.
memfd_create() is still not included in glibc today, atlhough it's been
available since Linux 3.17 in Oct 2014.
memfd has numerous advantages over traditional shm/mmap for ipc memory
sharing with fd handle