On 10/13/2015 02:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Hmm, any test that has an empty .err and non-empty .out, but which does
>> not also have an TODO/FIXME stating that it is a bug, is worth checking.
>> So first, here's the list of non-empty .out files:
>>
>
> Actually, the point isn't to move
Eric Blake writes:
> On 10/07/2015 10:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> The alternate-good.json test was already covered by
>>> qapi-schema-test.json. As future commits will be tweaking
>>> how alternates are laid out, removing the duplicate test now
>>> reduces chur
On 10/07/2015 10:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> The alternate-good.json test was already covered by
>> qapi-schema-test.json. As future commits will be tweaking
>> how alternates are laid out, removing the duplicate test now
>> reduces churn.
>
> Do we have more posit
Eric Blake writes:
> The alternate-good.json test was already covered by
> qapi-schema-test.json. As future commits will be tweaking
> how alternates are laid out, removing the duplicate test now
> reduces churn.
Do we have more positive tests? They should probably all live in
qapi-schema-test
The alternate-good.json test was already covered by
qapi-schema-test.json. As future commits will be tweaking
how alternates are laid out, removing the duplicate test now
reduces churn.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
v7: new patch
---
tests/Makefile| 1 -
tests/qapi-sch
