Am 22.07.2016 um 10:17 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> space and compress it.
>
> These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. This
> fun
Am 08.08.2016 um 15:02 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17:39AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> > by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> > space and compress it.
> >
On 08/08/2016 04:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17:39AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
space and compress it.
These patches add the a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17:39AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> space and compress it.
>
> These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. T
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:17:39AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> space and compress it.
>
> These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. T
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
space and compress it.
These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. This
functionality is implemented by means of adding options to the qmp/hmp
