On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:38:33PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-12-12 12:36, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>How about things like pit_get_out(),
> >> pit_get_next_transition_time(), etc in qemu/hw/i8254_common.c? (If
> >> not used when KVM is enabled, then wh
On 2012-12-12 12:36, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>How about things like pit_get_out(),
>> pit_get_next_transition_time(), etc in qemu/hw/i8254_common.c? (If
>> not used when KVM is enabled, then why are they "common"?) What
>> are the implications if qemu and KVM
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:46:41AM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> > >
> > > Still needed:
> > >
> > > * Corresponding KVM patches. The best appr
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >
> > Still needed:
> >
> > * Corresponding KVM patches. The best approach may depend
> > on what option is selected for qemu above.
> > *
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:20:05AM +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> > 2. Just fix it immediately, and don't worry about migration. Squash
> >the last few patches together. A single missed periodic
> >timer tick that only happens when migrating
> >between versions
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> This series makes a series of mostly-unrelated fixes to allow
> running an old Microport UNIX (ca 1987) guest under qemu.
>
> Changes since version 6:
>* Patches 1 through 6 haven't changed, other than resolving
> a couple
Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> 2. Just fix it immediately, and don't worry about migration. Squash
>the last few patches together. A single missed periodic
>timer tick that only happens when migrating
>between versions of qemu is probably not a significant
>concern. (Unless someone kno
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:47:59AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes:
>
> > On 2012-12-10 06:14, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >>> This series makes a series of mostly-unrelated fixes to allow
> >>> running an old Mi
Jan Kiszka writes:
> On 2012-12-10 06:14, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>>> This series makes a series of mostly-unrelated fixes to allow
>>> running an old Microport UNIX (ca 1987) guest under qemu.
>>>
>>> Changes since version 6:
>>>
On 2012-12-10 06:14, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>> This series makes a series of mostly-unrelated fixes to allow
>> running an old Microport UNIX (ca 1987) guest under qemu.
>>
>> Changes since version 6:
>>* Patches 1 through 6 hav
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> This series makes a series of mostly-unrelated fixes to allow
> running an old Microport UNIX (ca 1987) guest under qemu.
>
> Changes since version 6:
>* Patches 1 through 6 haven't changed, other than resolving
> a couple
This series makes a series of mostly-unrelated fixes to allow
running an old Microport UNIX (ca 1987) guest under qemu.
Changes since version 6:
* Patches 1 through 6 haven't changed, other than resolving
a couple of simple conflicts.
* Patch 7 "fixes" IRQ0 by just making it work like b
12 matches
Mail list logo
