Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/11] iotests: Add test for potentially damaging repairs

2014-10-21 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 21.10.2014 um 16:20 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 2014-10-21 at 16:12, Kevin Wolf wrote: > >Am 20.10.2014 um 16:35 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > >>There are certain cases where repairing a qcow2 image might actually > >>damage it further (or rather, where repairing it has in fact damaged it > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/11] iotests: Add test for potentially damaging repairs

2014-10-21 Thread Max Reitz
On 2014-10-21 at 16:12, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 20.10.2014 um 16:35 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: There are certain cases where repairing a qcow2 image might actually damage it further (or rather, where repairing it has in fact damaged it further with the old qcow2 check implementation). This should n

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/11] iotests: Add test for potentially damaging repairs

2014-10-21 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 20.10.2014 um 16:35 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > There are certain cases where repairing a qcow2 image might actually > damage it further (or rather, where repairing it has in fact damaged it > further with the old qcow2 check implementation). This should not > happen, so add a test for these ca

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/11] iotests: Add test for potentially damaging repairs

2014-10-20 Thread Max Reitz
There are certain cases where repairing a qcow2 image might actually damage it further (or rather, where repairing it has in fact damaged it further with the old qcow2 check implementation). This should not happen, so add a test for these cases. Furthermore, the repair function now repairs refbloc