On 11/02/2017 04:01 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>> The overall conversion currently looks like:
>>> part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488)
>>> part 2: dirty-bitmap (merged, commit ca759622)
>>> part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v5 at [1])
>>> part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is p
On 10/20/2017 12:45 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 12.10.2017 um 05:46 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
>> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
>> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
>>
Am 12.10.2017 um 05:46 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
> much higher levels). I've therefore started the
There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of
converting our block status code to report at a byt
