On 2017-06-26 14:35, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The main goal of this series is to get the I/O tests passing
> 100% with LUKS when run with './check -luks'. It also adds a
> few more combinations to the LUKS/dmcrypt interoperability
> test.
>
> To make LUKS testing not quite as slow, we drop the
On Tue, 06/27 07:43, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./patchew-cli", line 430, in test_one
> git_clone_repo(clone, r["repo"], r["head"], logf)
> File "./patchew-cli", line 48, in git_clone_repo
>
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 20170626123510.20134-1-berra...@redhat.com
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/5] Improve I/O tests coverage of LUKS driver
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n
The main goal of this series is to get the I/O tests passing
100% with LUKS when run with './check -luks'. It also adds a
few more combinations to the LUKS/dmcrypt interoperability
test.
To make LUKS testing not quite as slow, we drop the PBKDF
iteration count down to a very small value. This does
