On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 18/12/2015 18:17, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> Does anyone have any ideas on how we can do this?
>>
>> AFAIK there is no way to currently do this, so we need to add
>> something. What is the preferred way to expose the buses?
>
> For now
On 18/12/2015 18:17, Alistair Francis wrote:
> Does anyone have any ideas on how we can do this?
>
> AFAIK there is no way to currently do this, so we need to add
> something. What is the preferred way to expose the buses?
For now, what you're doing is okay for me, just moving the funky code in
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 17/12/2015 12:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > It's a hack and I don't want it to become a sanctioned way to do it.
>> > It's already messing around pretty heavily with qdev internals, see the
>> > line right after QLIST_INSERT_HEAD:
>> >
On 17/12/2015 12:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > It's a hack and I don't want it to become a sanctioned way to do it.
> > It's already messing around pretty heavily with qdev internals, see the
> > line right after QLIST_INSERT_HEAD:
> >
> > QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&dev->child_bus, spi_bus, siblin
On 17 December 2015 at 10:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 17/12/2015 09:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> > In any case, I would prefer qdev_bus_rename to stay in xlnx-zynqmp.c.
>> I disagree that it should be in xlnx-zynqmp.c. Either
>> (a) qdev already provides some reasonable mechanism for
>> SoC
On 17/12/2015 09:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > In any case, I would prefer qdev_bus_rename to stay in xlnx-zynqmp.c.
> I disagree that it should be in xlnx-zynqmp.c. Either
> (a) qdev already provides some reasonable mechanism for
> SoC container like this to allow their users to get at
> buses p
On 16 December 2015 at 23:24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/12/2015 22:45, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> +
>> +/* Rename each SPI bus after the SPI device to allow the board
>> + * to access all of the busses from the SoC.
>> + */
>> +spi_bus = qdev_get_child_bus(DE
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/12/2015 22:45, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> +
>> +/* Rename each SPI bus after the SPI device to allow the board
>> + * to access all of the busses from the SoC.
>> + */
>> +spi_bus = qdev_get_child_bus
On 16/12/2015 22:45, Alistair Francis wrote:
> +
> +/* Rename each SPI bus after the SPI device to allow the board
> + * to access all of the busses from the SoC.
> + */
> +spi_bus = qdev_get_child_bus(DEVICE(&s->spi[i]), "spi0");
> +snprintf(bus_name, 6, "
Connect the Xilinx SPI devices to the ZynqMP model.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis
---
V5:
- Use the bus renaming function
V4:
- Rename the SPI busses so that they can all be accessed from the SoC
- Don't set the num-busses property
V3:
- Expose the SPI Bus as part of the SoC device
V2:
- D
10 matches
Mail list logo
