Hello!
> Should the pci_dev be passed to kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route() as well?
> Currently, the only implementer of this function (s390x) does not need
> it; but it shouldn't hurt?
Yes, it shouldn't. I didn't pass it there exactly because of this reason.
However, &kroute is also passed to this f
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:05:17 +0300
Pavel Fedin wrote:
> In-kernel ITS emulation on ARM64 will require to supply requester IDs.
> These IDs can now be retrieved from the device pointer using new
> pci_requester_id() function.
>
> This patch adds pci_dev pointer to KVM GSI routing functions and ma
In-kernel ITS emulation on ARM64 will require to supply requester IDs.
These IDs can now be retrieved from the device pointer using new
pci_requester_id() function.
This patch adds pci_dev pointer to KVM GSI routing functions and makes
callers passing it.
x86 architecture does not use requester I
