On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 01:40:58PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
> >> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
> >
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
>> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
>> problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
>> f
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
> >> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
> >> problem just makin
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
>> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
>> problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
>> fin
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
>> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
>> problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
>> f
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
> problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
> finish its work before w
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:42:38PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
> problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
> finish its work before w
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
> a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
> problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
> finish its work before we procedeed with t
Each time that we sync the bitmap, it is a possiblity that we receive
a page that is being processed by a different thread. We fix this
problem just making sure that we wait for all receiving threads to
finish its work before we procedeed with the next stage.
We are low on page flags, so we use a
