On 04/08/2015 04:19 PM, John Snow wrote:
> As a convenience: between incremental backups, bitmap migrations
> and bitmap persistence we seem to need to recalculate these a lot.
>
> Because the lengths are a little bit-twiddly, let's just solidly
> cache them and be done with it.
>
> Reviewed-by:
As a convenience: between incremental backups, bitmap migrations
and bitmap persistence we seem to need to recalculate these a lot.
Because the lengths are a little bit-twiddly, let's just solidly
cache them and be done with it.
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
util/hbitmap.
