On Fri, 07/15 14:10, Max Reitz wrote:
>
> I just remembered that it's very much justified now, as you have only
> recently adopted this series.
>
> It's just always funny to get a “What are you talking about?” reply to
> some nagging I sent out long enough in the past that I can't even
> remember
On 07/15/2016 08:04 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 14.07.2016 22:00, John Snow wrote:
>> On 06/22/2016 11:53 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> On 03.06.2016 06:32, Fam Zheng wrote:
The added group of operations enables tracking of the changed bits in
the dirty bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zhe
On 15.07.2016 14:04, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 14.07.2016 22:00, John Snow wrote:
>> On 06/22/2016 11:53 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> On 03.06.2016 06:32, Fam Zheng wrote:
The added group of operations enables tracking of the changed bits in
the dirty bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
>
On 14.07.2016 22:00, John Snow wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 11:53 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 03.06.2016 06:32, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> The added group of operations enables tracking of the changed bits in
>>> the dirty bitmap.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
>>> ---
>>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 52
On 06/22/2016 11:53 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 03.06.2016 06:32, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> The added group of operations enables tracking of the changed bits in
>> the dirty bitmap.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
>> ---
>> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 52
>> +
On 03.06.2016 06:32, Fam Zheng wrote:
> The added group of operations enables tracking of the changed bits in
> the dirty bitmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 52
>
> include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 9
>
The added group of operations enables tracking of the changed bits in
the dirty bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 52
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 9
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/d
