Hi Edgar,
On 10/09/2017 10:21 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:13:16PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a follow up series using multiples PHY on the MDIO bus based on this
>> series.
>
> Hi Philippe!
>
> I think this is a good improvement compare
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:13:16PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a follow up series using multiples PHY on the MDIO bus based on this
> series.
Hi Philippe!
I think this is a good improvement compared to todays state.
It may make sense to have the generic mdio bus functio
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a follow up series using multiples PHY on the MDIO bus based on this
> series.
I haven't looked at this yet, but it looks interesting.
We actually have this concept merged in our tree and it works pretty
well. You c
Hi,
I have a follow up series using multiples PHY on the MDIO bus based on this
series.
Regards,
Phil.
Grant's previous work:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-02/msg00257.html
"There is more work to be done, particularly in moving to the common GPIO api,
but that work can
