On Tue, 09/05 11:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 04:35, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ping for 2.11.
> >
> > Peter, what do you think?
> >
> > On Mon, 07/17 10:38, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> This is the arm part that was left out from:
> >>
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/q
On 5 September 2017 at 04:35, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ping for 2.11.
>
> Peter, what do you think?
>
> On Mon, 07/17 10:38, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> This is the arm part that was left out from:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg04006.html
>>
>> Make use of the new DEFINE
Hi,
Ping for 2.11.
Peter, what do you think?
On Mon, 07/17 10:38, Fam Zheng wrote:
> This is the arm part that was left out from:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg04006.html
>
> Make use of the new DEFINE_PROP_LINK, in favor of open coded the
> object_property_add_l
This is the arm part that was left out from:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg04006.html
Make use of the new DEFINE_PROP_LINK, in favor of open coded the
object_property_add_link. The advantage of it is the property now get reflected
in the info qtree output, for a bit mor
