On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:07:15PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 13.01.2015 um 17:04 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> [...]
> > I'm really starting to get worried that you are going to break things.
> > This DASD hack is a layering violation but okay, go ahead if you want.
> > But now you are
Am 13.01.2015 um 17:04 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
[...]
> I'm really starting to get worried that you are going to break things.
> This DASD hack is a layering violation but okay, go ahead if you want.
> But now you are also thinking about breaking live migration.
>
> The proper thing to do is to in
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:51:51AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Christian Borntraeger writes:
>>
>> > Am 02.01.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> >>> Are you ok with the patches?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:51:51AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Christian Borntraeger writes:
>
> > Am 02.01.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>> Are you ok with the patches? If yes, can you take care of thes
Christian Borntraeger writes:
> Am 02.01.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Are you ok with the patches? If yes, can you take care of these
>>> patches in the block tree?
>>
>> This series looks close, I've left co
On 01/02/2015 02:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:17:59PM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
Updates v4 -> v5:
Minor Updates according the last review from Markus:
1. update commit message for patch 2
2. fix comment typos
3. fix check_for_dasd to return -1 instead of -ENOT
Am 02.01.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Are you ok with the patches? If yes, can you take care of these patches in
>> the block tree?
>
> This series looks close, I've left comments on the patches.
OK, so you wou
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:59:50PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Are you ok with the patches? If yes, can you take care of these patches in
> the block tree?
This series looks close, I've left comments on the patches.
The series is fine for command-line QEMU users where probing makes the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:17:59PM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote:
> Updates v4 -> v5:
>
> Minor Updates according the last review from Markus:
> 1. update commit message for patch 2
> 2. fix comment typos
> 3. fix check_for_dasd to return -1 instead of -ENOTSUP
>
> Thanks,
> Kate.
>
>
Am 18.12.2014 um 12:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova:
> Updates v4 -> v5:
>
> Minor Updates according the last review from Markus:
> 1. update commit message for patch 2
> 2. fix comment typos
> 3. fix check_for_dasd to return -1 instead of -ENOTSUP
>
> Thanks,
> Kate.
>
> -
Updates v4 -> v5:
Minor Updates according the last review from Markus:
1. update commit message for patch 2
2. fix comment typos
3. fix check_for_dasd to return -1 instead of -ENOTSUP
Thanks,
Kate.
---
Patchset Description (didn't ch
11 matches
Mail list logo