> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/2017 18:54, Harris, James R wrote:
Hi Michael,
Yes - we (SPDK team at Intel) have this on our
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/07/2017 19:03, Harris, James R wrote:
>>
>> vhost-user-blk:
>>
>> We have an initial implementation in our SPDK QEMU repo. Changpeng Liu
>> (added)
>> will be sending this to the QEMU mailing list shortly. If you are
>> in
Hi
- Original Message -
>
> > On Jul 6, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/07/2017 18:54, Harris, James R wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> Yes - we (SPDK team at Intel) have this on our TODO list, in addition
> >> to a polled mode virtio-scsi driver (akin t
On 06/07/2017 19:03, Harris, James R wrote:
>
> vhost-user-blk:
>
> We have an initial implementation in our SPDK QEMU repo. Changpeng Liu
> (added)
> will be sending this to the QEMU mailing list shortly. If you are interested
> in viewing it
> before it hits the mailing list, you can take
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/07/2017 18:54, Harris, James R wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Yes - we (SPDK team at Intel) have this on our TODO list, in addition
>> to a polled mode virtio-scsi driver (akin to the DPDK virtio-net driver that
>> can be used in t
On 06/07/2017 18:54, Harris, James R wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Yes - we (SPDK team at Intel) have this on our TODO list, in addition
> to a polled mode virtio-scsi driver (akin to the DPDK virtio-net driver that
> can be used in the guest).
Can you also look at virtio-blk poll-mode drivers and v
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 6:41 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:53:33PM +, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>>> On 2 Mar 2017, at 21:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:25:49AM -0800, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
Based on various discussions o
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:53:33PM +, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
> > On 2 Mar 2017, at 21:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:25:49AM -0800, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> >> Based on various discussions on the 2016 KVM Forum, I'm sending over a
> >> vhost-user-scsi im
> On 2 Mar 2017, at 21:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:25:49AM -0800, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>> Based on various discussions on the 2016 KVM Forum, I'm sending over a
>> vhost-user-scsi implementation for your consideration.
>>
>> This patchset introduces a new vho
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:25:49AM -0800, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> Based on various discussions on the 2016 KVM Forum, I'm sending over a
> vhost-user-scsi implementation for your consideration.
>
> This patchset introduces a new vhost-user SCSI device. While heavily
> based on vhost-scsi, it is
Hi,
This series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Message-id: 1488479153-21203-1-git-send-email-fel...@nutanix.com
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] Introduce
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Message-id: 1488479153-21203-1-git-send-email-fel...@nutanix.com
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] Introduce vhost-user-scsi and sample
application
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin
Based on various discussions on the 2016 KVM Forum, I'm sending over a
vhost-user-scsi implementation for your consideration.
This patchset introduces a new vhost-user SCSI device. While heavily
based on vhost-scsi, it is implemented using vhost's userspace
counterpart. The device has been coded a
13 matches
Mail list logo
