Hi Peter,
On 24/11/17 15:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2017 at 14:32, Auger Eric wrote:
>> On 24/11/17 15:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Thanks. My remaining question is: how important it is to
>>> put some of this into 2.11? We're getting quite close to
>>> the release now so I'm gettin
On 24 November 2017 at 14:32, Auger Eric wrote:
> On 24/11/17 15:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Thanks. My remaining question is: how important it is to
>> put some of this into 2.11? We're getting quite close to
>> the release now so I'm getting gradually more reluctant
>> to put in changes.
>
> I f
Hi Peter,
On 24/11/17 15:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2017 at 14:18, Eric Auger wrote:
>> At the moment the ITS is not properly reset. On System reset or
>> reboot, previous ITS register values and caches are left
>> unchanged. Some of the registers might point to some guest RAM
>> t
On 24 November 2017 at 14:18, Eric Auger wrote:
> At the moment the ITS is not properly reset. On System reset or
> reboot, previous ITS register values and caches are left
> unchanged. Some of the registers might point to some guest RAM
> tables which are not valid anymore. This leads to state
>
At the moment the ITS is not properly reset. On System reset or
reboot, previous ITS register values and caches are left
unchanged. Some of the registers might point to some guest RAM
tables which are not valid anymore. This leads to state
inconsistencies that are detected by the kernel save/restor
