Eric Blake writes:
> On 08/09/2017 10:34 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> None of our tests were directly using qtest_qmp() and friends;
>>> even tests like postcopy-test.c that manage multiple connections
>>> get along just fine changing global_qtest as needed (other t
On 08/09/2017 10:34 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> None of our tests were directly using qtest_qmp() and friends;
>> even tests like postcopy-test.c that manage multiple connections
>> get along just fine changing global_qtest as needed (other than
>> one callsite where it
Eric Blake writes:
> None of our tests were directly using qtest_qmp() and friends;
> even tests like postcopy-test.c that manage multiple connections
> get along just fine changing global_qtest as needed (other than
> one callsite where it forgot to use the inlined form). It's
> also annoying t
None of our tests were directly using qtest_qmp() and friends;
even tests like postcopy-test.c that manage multiple connections
get along just fine changing global_qtest as needed (other than
one callsite where it forgot to use the inlined form). It's
also annoying that we have qmp_async() but qte
