On Thu 14 Jul 2016 03:28:10 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> change-backing-file to accept a node-name without lifting the
> restriction that we're operating at a ro
On 14.07.2016 22:44, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 07:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
>> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
>> change-backing-file to accept a node-name without lifting the
>> restrict
On 07/14/2016 07:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> change-backing-file to accept a node-name without lifting the
> restriction that we're operating at a root node.
>
>
In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
change-backing-file to accept a node-name without lifting the
restriction that we're operating at a root node.
In case of an invalid device name, the command return
