On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:49:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Now when network down for postcopy, the source side will not fail the
> > migration. Instead we convert the status into this new paused state, and
> > we will try to wait for a rescue
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:49:45AM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > Now when network down for postcopy, the source side will not fail the
> > > migration. Instead we convert the status into this new paused s
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Now when network down for postcopy, the source side will not fail the
> migration. Instead we convert the status into this new paused state, and
> we will try to wait for a rescue in the future.
>
> If a recovery is detected, migration_thread() will reset it
Now when network down for postcopy, the source side will not fail the
migration. Instead we convert the status into this new paused state, and
we will try to wait for a rescue in the future.
If a recovery is detected, migration_thread() will reset its local
variables to prepare for that.
Reviewed
