Eric Blake writes:
> On 03/08/2016 12:09 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>>
>>> I think what would sway me over the fence is looking at some of our
>>> constructs: for example, qapi-types.py has gen_object() which it now
>>> calls recursively. When called directly from visit_object_type(), we
>>
On 03/08/2016 12:09 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> I think what would sway me over the fence is looking at some of our
>> constructs: for example, qapi-types.py has gen_object() which it now
>> calls recursively. When called directly from visit_object_type(), we
>> have all the pieces; when c
Eric Blake writes:
> On 03/08/2016 07:24 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> We already have several places that want to visit all the members
>>> of an implicit object within a larger context (simple union variant,
>>> event with anonymous data, command with anonymous arg
On 03/08/2016 07:24 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> We already have several places that want to visit all the members
>> of an implicit object within a larger context (simple union variant,
>> event with anonymous data, command with anonymous arguments struct);
>> and will
Eric Blake writes:
> We already have several places that want to visit all the members
> of an implicit object within a larger context (simple union variant,
> event with anonymous data, command with anonymous arguments struct);
> and will be adding another one soon (the ability to declare an
> a
We already have several places that want to visit all the members
of an implicit object within a larger context (simple union variant,
event with anonymous data, command with anonymous arguments struct);
and will be adding another one soon (the ability to declare an
anonymous base for a flat union)
