Am 22.11.2019 um 15:40 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 22.11.2019 um 08:29 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> > At any rate, your counterpoint is taken - whatever we pick, we'll want
> >> > to make sure that introspection can expose semantics, and whether we
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 22.11.2019 um 08:29 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> > At any rate, your counterpoint is taken - whatever we pick, we'll want
>> > to make sure that introspection can expose semantics, and whether we
>> > can make '*' redundant with some other form of longhand in the
Am 22.11.2019 um 08:29 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> > At any rate, your counterpoint is taken - whatever we pick, we'll want
> > to make sure that introspection can expose semantics, and whether we
> > can make '*' redundant with some other form of longhand in the qapi
> > language is in pa
Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/21/19 1:46 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
The '*' is redundant in this form.
Can anyone think of reasons for keeping it anyway? Against?
>>>
>>> Is there ever a reason to allow an optional member but without a
>>> 'default' value? Or can we just blindly
On 11/21/19 1:46 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
The '*' is redundant in this form.
Can anyone think of reasons for keeping it anyway? Against?
Is there ever a reason to allow an optional member but without a
'default' value? Or can we just blindly state that if 'default' is
not present, that
Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/21/19 9:07 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Max Reitz writes:
>>
>>> With this change, it is possible to give default values for struct
>>> members, as follows:
>>>
>>>What you had to do so far:
>>>
>>> # @member: Some description, defaults to 42.
>>> { 's
On 11/21/19 9:07 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Max Reitz writes:
With this change, it is possible to give default values for struct
members, as follows:
What you had to do so far:
# @member: Some description, defaults to 42.
{ 'struct': 'Foo',
'data': { '*member': 'int' }
Max Reitz writes:
> With this change, it is possible to give default values for struct
> members, as follows:
>
> What you had to do so far:
>
> # @member: Some description, defaults to 42.
> { 'struct': 'Foo',
> 'data': { '*member': 'int' } }
>
> What you can do now:
>
> {
Less than thorough review, because I expect the necessary rebase will
require a bit of rewriting here and there.
Max Reitz writes:
> With this change, it is possible to give default values for struct
> members, as follows:
>
> What you had to do so far:
>
> # @member: Some description, def
With this change, it is possible to give default values for struct
members, as follows:
What you had to do so far:
# @member: Some description, defaults to 42.
{ 'struct': 'Foo',
'data': { '*member': 'int' } }
What you can do now:
{ 'struct': 'Foo',
'data': { '*membe
10 matches
Mail list logo
