On Thu 14 Jul 2016 03:28:04 PM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
> we're operating at a root node
On 07/14/2016 07:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
> external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
> block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
> we're operating at a root node.
>
> In cas
In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the
external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts
block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that
we're operating at a root node.
In case of an invalid device name, the command returns the G
