On 17 August 2016 at 01:06, Andrew Dutcher wrote:
> Also- I'm having issues applying the new patch:
>
> @@ -5768,7 +5774,9 @@ int floatx80_lt(floatx80 a, floatx80 b,
> float_status *status)
>
> **/
> int floatx80_unorde
Also- I'm having issues applying the new patch:
@@ -5768,7 +5774,9 @@ int floatx80_lt(floatx80 a, floatx80 b,
float_status *status)
**/
int floatx80_unordered(floatx80 a, floatx80 b, float_status *status)
{
-if (
I explicitly left the check off the comparison operations because I
misread the NaN check as something equivalent to the check I would be
adding. I'll add it shortly.
With regards to adding int32_indefinite, etc constants, I think I'll
leave it as is -- I'd prefer to have *what* happens clear (ret
On 15 August 2016 at 23:27, Andrew Dutcher wrote:
> All operations that take a floatx80 as an operand need to have their
> inputs checked for malformed encodings. In all of these cases, use the
> function floatx80_invalid_encoding to perform the check. If an invalid
> operand is found, raise an in
All operations that take a floatx80 as an operand need to have their
inputs checked for malformed encodings. In all of these cases, use the
function floatx80_invalid_encoding to perform the check. If an invalid
operand is found, raise an invalid operation exception, and then return
either NaN (for
