On 04/11/2018 09:50 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 04/11/2018 03:20 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
I may be all wrong, though... can we at least have a translation of
ECA.28 and EECA.28 (the "ap is there" bit and the "ap instructions are
interpreted" bit?)
I think we have a misunderstanding here. I w
On 04/09/2018 05:32 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 18:07:56 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 04/03/2018 05:36 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
O
On 04/11/2018 03:20 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
I may be all wrong, though... can we at least have a translation of
ECA.28 and EECA.28 (the "ap is there" bit and the "ap instructions are
interpreted" bit?)
>>> I think we have a misunderstanding here. I will wait for Tony. Mayb
On 04/09/2018 06:51 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:37:42 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
On 04/09/2018 11:32 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
We can kind of (i.e. modulo EECA.28) ensure this in a different fashion I
think. How
about proclaiming a 'has ap instructions, but nothing to see her
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:37:42 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 11:32 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> We can kind of (i.e. modulo EECA.28) ensure this in a different fashion I
> >> think. How
> >> about proclaiming a 'has ap instructions, but nothing to see here' in the
> >> SIE interpreted f
On 04/09/2018 11:32 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> We can kind of (i.e. modulo EECA.28) ensure this in a different fashion I
>> think. How
>> about proclaiming a 'has ap instructions, but nothing to see here' in the
>> SIE interpreted flavor (ECA.28 set) the default way of having ap instructions
>>
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 18:07:56 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > On 04/03/2018 05:36 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
> >> Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 26/03/2018 10
On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 04/03/2018 05:36 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
>> Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wro
On 06/04/2018 16:08, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 16/03/2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions are not b
On 16/03/2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions are not being interpreted by the firmware, then
the
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:32:49PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2018 02:09 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > Yes it is conceptually ugly. I'm 100% with you. That's why it should go
> > away soon. From the practicality perspective however I would even argue
> > that it's
> > helpful to the u
On 04/06/2018 02:09 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> Yes it is conceptually ugly. I'm 100% with you. That's why it should go
> away soon. From the practicality perspective however I would even argue that
> it's
> helpful to the user: tells 'oops you have forgotten something'. IMHO
> it's a shortcut of t
On 04/06/2018 11:11 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 06.04.2018 10:40, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:17:47 +0200
>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> Hard to really give good advice without access to the documentation, but:
> - If we
On 06.04.2018 10:40, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:17:47 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Hard to really give good advice without access to the documentation, but:
- If we tell the guest that the feature is available, but it does
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:17:47 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >> Hard to really give good advice without access to the documentation, but:
> >> - If we tell the guest that the feature is available, but it does not
> >> get any cards to use, returning an e
On 04/05/2018 06:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> Hard to really give good advice without access to the documentation, but:
>> - If we tell the guest that the feature is available, but it does not
>> get any cards to use, returning an empty matrix makes the most sense
>> to me.
>> - I would no
On 04/03/2018 05:36 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
+/*
+ * The Query Configuration Information (QCI) fun
On 04/04/2018 10:12 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 09:43 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On 04/04/2018 15:33, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2018 07:09 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On 26/03/201
On 04/04/2018 09:43 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 04/04/2018 15:33, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 04/04/2018 07:09 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowia
On 04/04/2018 15:33, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 04/04/2018 07:09 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP
On 04/03/2018 05:36 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
+/*
+ * The Query Configuration Information (QCI) fun
On 04/04/2018 14:59, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 04/04/2018 07:09 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP
On 04/04/2018 07:09 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e.,
On 04/04/2018 07:09 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e.,
On 02/04/2018 18:36, Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is tha
On 03/04/2018 11:36, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
+/*
+ * The Query Configuration Information (QCI) functi
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 12:36:27 -0400
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> > On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * The Query Configuration Information (QCI) function (fc == 4)
> >>>
On 03/26/2018 08:01 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On 03/26/2018 11:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
+int ap_device_handle_pqap(S390CPU *cpu)
+{
+CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
+int fc = 4 & (env->regs[0] >> 24);
+
+/*
+ * The Query Configuration Information (QCI) function (fc == 4) does not
On 03/26/2018 05:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will ini
On 03/26/2018 04:32 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions a
On 03/26/2018 11:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> +int ap_device_handle_pqap(S390CPU *cpu)
>>> +{
>>> +CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>>> +int fc = 4 & (env->regs[0] >> 24);
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * The Query Configuration Information (QCI) function (fc == 4) does
>>> not
>>> + *
On 26/03/2018 10:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions are
On 16.03.2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
> the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
> the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
> AP instructions are not being interpreted by the firmware, th
On 03/16/2018 04:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 16/03/2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions are no
On 16/03/2018 00:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions are not being interpreted by the firmware, then
the
If the CPU model indicates that AP facility is installed on
the guest (i.e., -cpu ,ap=on), then the expectation is that
the AP bus running in the guest will initialize; however, if the
AP instructions are not being interpreted by the firmware, then
they will be intercepted and routed back to QE
36 matches
Mail list logo
