On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Bharata B Rao
wrote:
> Currently CPUState.cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
> index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
> fine as long as we only add CPU
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:32:07AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Currently CPUState.cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
> index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
> fine as long as we only
On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:32:07 +0530
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Currently CPUState.cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
> index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
> fine as long as we only add C
Currently CPUState.cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
fine as long as we only add CPUs, but there are architectures which
are starting to support CPU
