On 2012-09-13 21:56, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> Jan Kiszka a écrit :
>> On 2012-09-13 07:55, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
>>> This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
>>> we may ignore it in some situations and handle it in some others.
>>>
>>> However, MS Windows 2003 PXE
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
On 2012-09-13 07:55, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
we may ignore it in some situations and handle it in some others.
However, MS Windows 2003 PXE boot client requests a block size of the MTU
(most of the tim
On 2012-09-13 07:55, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
> we may ignore it in some situations and handle it in some others.
>
> However, MS Windows 2003 PXE boot client requests a block size of the MTU
> (most of the times 1472 bytes)
This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
we may ignore it in some situations and handle it in some others.
However, MS Windows 2003 PXE boot client requests a block size of the MTU
(most of the times 1472 bytes), and doesn't work if the option is not
acknowledged (w
