On 2013-04-02 07:41, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 2013-04-01 23:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
Is this faster than a load/store with std/ldbrx?
Hmm. Almost certainly not. And since we've got stack space
allocated for function calls, we've got scratch space to do it in.
Probably similar for bswap32 t
On 04/02/2013 05:12 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 2013-04-02 07:41, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 2013-04-01 23:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
Is this faster than a load/store with std/ldbrx?
Hmm. Almost certainly not. And since we've got stack space
allocated for function calls, we've got scratch
Am 02.04.2013 um 15:44 schrieb Richard Henderson :
> On 2013-04-01 23:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Is this faster than a load/store with std/ldbrx?
>
> Hmm. Almost certainly not. And since we've got stack space
> allocated for function calls, we've got scratch space to do it in.
>
> Probably
On 2013-04-01 23:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
Is this faster than a load/store with std/ldbrx?
Hmm. Almost certainly not. And since we've got stack space
allocated for function calls, we've got scratch space to do it in.
Probably similar for bswap32 too, eh?
I'll do a tiny bit o benchmarking f
On 02.04.2013, at 06:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Aurelien Jarno
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Is this faster than a load/store with std/ldbrx?
Alex
> ---
> tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c | 35 +++
> tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Jarno
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c | 35 +++
tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c b/tcg/ppc64/tcg-target.c
index d8131ec..1806364
