On 31.08.2013, at 00:19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 16:34 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>>> So - kvmppc_define_rtas_in_kernel() or kvmppc_define_rtas_kernel_token()?
>>
>> The former probably.
>
> I told him the latter :-) Honestly, your name is gross :-) Mine
> des
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 16:34 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > So - kvmppc_define_rtas_in_kernel() or kvmppc_define_rtas_kernel_token()?
>
> The former probably.
I told him the latter :-) Honestly, your name is gross :-) Mine
describes exactly what the calls does.
> > I would actually though that
Hello Benjamin,
On 08/27/13 02:43, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Am I dreaming ? Those patches were written about a year ago and you guys
> are still nitpicking on names ? They should have been merged a LONG time
> ago ...
>
> I'm seriously wondering how people get anything done with qemu KVM
On 29.08.2013, at 10:18, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 06:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 27.08.2013, at 06:10, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 03:48 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Also, QEMU is definitely not the only project that has higher
>>
On 08/27/2013 06:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 27.08.2013, at 06:10, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 03:48 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Also, QEMU is definitely not the only project that has higher
>>> acceptance
>>> criteria than patch-works-for-the-patch-autho
On 27.08.2013, at 06:10, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 03:48 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Also, QEMU is definitely not the only project that has higher
>> acceptance
>> criteria than patch-works-for-the-patch-author. :)
>
> There's a difference between high acceptance
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 03:48 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Also, QEMU is definitely not the only project that has higher
> acceptance
> criteria than patch-works-for-the-patch-author. :)
There's a difference between high acceptance criteria and systematic
bike shed painting including in some case
Am 27.08.2013 02:43, schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> Am I dreaming ? Those patches were written about a year ago and you guys
> are still nitpicking on names ? They should have been merged a LONG time
> ago ...
[snip]
Ben, this patch was first posted to qemu-devel June 4th, this year.
If patche
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 15:11 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 19.08.2013, at 07:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
> > From: David Gibson
> >
> > Recent PowerKVM allows the kernel to intercept some RTAS calls from
> the
> > guest directly. This is used to implement the more efficient
> in-kernel
On 19.08.2013, at 07:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> From: David Gibson
>
> Recent PowerKVM allows the kernel to intercept some RTAS calls from the
> guest directly. This is used to implement the more efficient in-kernel
> XICS for example. qemu is still responsible for assigning the RTAS t
From: David Gibson
Recent PowerKVM allows the kernel to intercept some RTAS calls from the
guest directly. This is used to implement the more efficient in-kernel
XICS for example. qemu is still responsible for assigning the RTAS token
numbers however, and needs to tell the kernel which RTAS fun
11 matches
Mail list logo
