* Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:39:14PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> [...]
> > * Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: "Dr. David Ala
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:39:14PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
[...]
> * Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)
> > wrote:
> > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> > >
> > > Currently QEMU sets the x86 number
* Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > Currently QEMU sets the x86 number of physical address bits to the
> > magic number 40. This is only correct on some small AMD
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> Currently QEMU sets the x86 number of physical address bits to the
> magic number 40. This is only correct on some small AMD systems;
> Intel systems tend to have 36, 39, 46 bits, a
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> Currently QEMU sets the x86 number of physical address bits to the
> magic number 40. This is only correct on some small AMD systems;
> Intel systems tend to have 36, 39, 46 bits, a
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
Currently QEMU sets the x86 number of physical address bits to the
magic number 40. This is only correct on some small AMD systems;
Intel systems tend to have 36, 39, 46 bits, and large AMD systems
tend to have 48.
Having the value different from your actual hardw
