On 07/06/2018 07:44 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:19:56PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 07/02/2018 01:11 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2018 12:03 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,9
On 07/06/2018 07:44 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:19:56PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 07/02/2018 01:11 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2018 12:03 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,9
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:19:56PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 01:11 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 07/02/2018 12:03 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >>> @@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_reset(DeviceSt
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 17:19:56 +0200
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 01:11 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 07/02/2018 12:03 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >>> @@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_reset(DeviceState
On 07/02/2018 01:11 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 12:03 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>>> @@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* TODO : poor VIO device indexing .
On 07/02/2018 12:03 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
>> @@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/* TODO : poor VIO device indexing ... */
>> +static uint32_t vio_index;
>
> I think we coul
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,9 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
> }
> }
>
> +/* TODO : poor VIO device indexing ... */
> +static uint32_t vio_index;
I think we could also use (dev->reg & 0xff) as an index for
the VIO device
This proposal introduces a new IRQ number space layout using static
numbers for all devices and a bitmap allocator for the MSI IRQ numbers
which are negotiated by the guest at runtime.
The previous layout is kept in pre-3.0 machines raising the
'legacy_irq_allocation' machine class flag.
Signed-o
