Hi
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Claudio Fontana
wrote:
> (should we rely on sizeof(long) here?)
This is unrelated to the fix (MIN/MAX). I will add a patch to change
the protocol.
--
Marc-André Lureau
On 15.09.2015 18:07, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> If the fifo has 0 bytes, and the read is of size 1, the call to
> fifo8_push_all() will copy off boundary data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
> ---
> hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 inser
From: Marc-André Lureau
If the fifo has 0 bytes, and the read is of size 1, the call to
fifo8_push_all() will copy off boundary data.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
---
hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
