On Apr 12 18:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 20:30, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> > The ARM PMU implementation currently contains a basic cycle counter, but it
> > is
> > often useful to gather counts of other events and filter them based on
> > execution mode. These patches flesh out the
On 16 March 2018 at 20:30, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> The ARM PMU implementation currently contains a basic cycle counter, but it is
> often useful to gather counts of other events and filter them based on
> execution mode. These patches flesh out the implementations of various PMU
> registers includi
521232280-13089-1-git-send-email-alind...@codeaurora.org
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] More fully implement ARM PMUv3
>
> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> #!/bin/bash
>
> BASE=base
> n=1
> total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
> failed=0
>
>
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 1521232280-13089-1-git-send-email-alind...@codeaurora.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] More fully implement ARM PMUv3
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE
The ARM PMU implementation currently contains a basic cycle counter, but it is
often useful to gather counts of other events and filter them based on
execution mode. These patches flesh out the implementations of various PMU
registers including PM[X]EVCNTR and PM[X]EVTYPER, add a struct definition
