On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:56:41 +0800
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 08:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:37 +0100
> > Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> >> I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> >> that to users who might have QEMU buri
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 05/29/2012 04:14 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:17:04 +0100
>>> Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
What we need to decide is whether it's okay to drop QEMU "VLANs"
completely and change dump command-line synta
On 05/25/2012 08:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:37 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere. One
day they upgrade packages and suddenly their stuff
On 05/29/2012 04:14 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Luiz Capitulino writes:
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:17:04 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
What we need to decide is whether it's okay to drop QEMU "VLANs"
completely and change dump command-line syntax?
I'd vote for dropping it.
I think vlan-hub
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:17:04 +0100
> Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
>> What we need to decide is whether it's okay to drop QEMU "VLANs"
>> completely and change dump command-line syntax?
>
> I'd vote for dropping it.
>
>> I think vlan-hub doesn't hurt anyone because the code
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:17:04 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> What we need to decide is whether it's okay to drop QEMU "VLANs"
> completely and change dump command-line syntax?
I'd vote for dropping it.
> I think vlan-hub doesn't hurt anyone because the code has been isolated
> and we keep backwa
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:56:28AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:47:28 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > Il 25/05/2012 15:43, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > >> Yeah, VDE probably includes something like an hub. But then we could
> > >> drop even "-net socket", "-net ud
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:47:28 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:43, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> Yeah, VDE probably includes something like an hub. But then we could
> >> drop even "-net socket", "-net udp", "-net dump", and only leave in
> >> vde+tap+slirp. Or even move slirp in
Il 25/05/2012 15:43, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>> Yeah, VDE probably includes something like an hub. But then we could
>> drop even "-net socket", "-net udp", "-net dump", and only leave in
>> vde+tap+slirp. Or even move slirp into VDE. :) That's a very different
>> thing.
>
> Let's start wit
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:37:15 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:30, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:28 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> Il 25/05/2012 15:18, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >
> > Still not sure what you mean...
> >>> I meant it's
Il 25/05/2012 15:30, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:28 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> Il 25/05/2012 15:18, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>
> Still not sure what you mean...
>>> I meant it's a similar case. kqemu was a special case and maintenance
>>> burden.
>>>
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:19:28 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:18, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> >
> >> > Still not sure what you mean...
> > I meant it's a similar case. kqemu was a special case and maintenance
> > burden.
> > We've dropped it and didn't regret. What's stopping
Il 25/05/2012 15:18, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Still not sure what you mean...
> I meant it's a similar case. kqemu was a special case and maintenance burden.
> We've dropped it and didn't regret. What's stopping us from doing the same
> thing with vlans?
That we have an alternative,
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:14:39 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 15:07, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:59:25 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> Il 25/05/2012 14:53, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel
Il 25/05/2012 15:07, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:59:25 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> Il 25/05/2012 14:53, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts
Il 25/05/2012 14:53, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
>> > I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
>> > that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere. One
>> > day they upgrade packages and suddenly their stuff doesn't work
>> > anymore.
> This is very sim
On Fri, 25 May 2012 14:59:25 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/05/2012 14:53, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >> > I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> >> > that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere. One
> >> > day they upgrade packages and
On Fri, 25 May 2012 13:01:37 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I agree it would be nice to drop entirely but I don't feel happy doing
> that to users who might have QEMU buried in scripts somewhere. One
> day they upgrade packages and suddenly their stuff doesn't work
> anymore.
This is very simil
On Fri, 25 May 2012 08:47:18 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Luiz Capitulino
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
> > zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu
> >>
> >> The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was don
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:53:21PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:53:21PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
>>> zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> > From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>> >
>>> > The patchset implements networ
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:53:21PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
>> zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > From: Zhi Yong Wu
>> >
>> > The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done
>> > by stefan, and i r
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:53:21PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
> zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > From: Zhi Yong Wu
> >
> > The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done
> > by stefan, and i rebased it to latest QEMU upstream,
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
> zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done by
>> stefan, and i rebased it to latest QEMU upstream, did some testi
On Fri, 25 May 2012 01:59:06 +0800
zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done by
> stefan, and i rebased it to latest QEMU upstream, did some testings and am
> responsible for pushing it to QEMU upstream.
Hones
From: Zhi Yong Wu
The patchset implements network hub stead of vlan. The main work was done by
stefan, and i rebased it to latest QEMU upstream, did some testings and am
responsible for pushing it to QEMU upstream.
Changelog from v2:
1.) add the support for hub own flow control [paolo]
2.)
26 matches
Mail list logo
