On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 08:40:26 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Coverity is unhappy with the generated code. Nothing serious, just
> heaps of valid DEADCODE defects topped off with a few bogus
> FORWARD_NULL defects.
>
> I had a look at the generator, and decided I don't want to mess with
> it wi
Coverity is unhappy with the generated code. Nothing serious, just
heaps of valid DEADCODE defects topped off with a few bogus
FORWARD_NULL defects.
I had a look at the generator, and decided I don't want to mess with
it without decent test coverage. Unfortunately, a few features have
been added
