On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:56:29 -0400
> "Gabriel L. Somlo" wrote:
>
> > New since v2:
> >
> > - pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
> > (as suggested by Eduardo)
> >
> > I appreciate any further comm
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:56:29 -0400
"Gabriel L. Somlo" wrote:
> New since v2:
>
> - pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
> (as suggested by Eduardo)
>
> I appreciate any further comments and reviews. Hopefully we can make
> this palatable for upstream, modulo
On Do, 2015-09-17 at 17:01 -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > What I'm still missing is the motivation for the change.
> >
> > Went through old threads, still can't find it.
>
> I've been working on a sysfs driver to allow viewing fw_cfg file
> metadata (size, name, etc) and content (e.g. 'raw')
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:30:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:56:29AM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > New since v2:
> >
> > - pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
> > (as suggested by Eduardo)
> >
> > I appreciate any further
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:56:29AM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> New since v2:
>
> - pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
> (as suggested by Eduardo)
>
> I appreciate any further comments and reviews. Hopefully we can make
> this palatable for upstream, mod
New since v2:
- pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
(as suggested by Eduardo)
I appreciate any further comments and reviews. Hopefully we can make
this palatable for upstream, modulo the lingering concerns about whether
"QEMU0002" is ok to use as the valu
