Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On 28 March 2013 15:56, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I'll apply these.. In the future, please CC me when sending patches
> like this.
Yes, I tend to forget to CC you on general type patches (as
opposed to ones where you're specifically a maintainer for
the area); hence the ping with you added to the
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 28 March 2013 15:15, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 28.03.2013 12:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> Ping!
>>
>> All patches have at least one Reviewed-by or Acked-by including that of
>> the lm32 maintainer, so you could just apply these to arm-devs.next, no?
>
> Well, I cou
> On 28 March 2013 15:15, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 28.03.2013 12:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> >> Ping!
> >
> > All patches have at least one Reviewed-by or Acked-by including
> > that of
> > the lm32 maintainer, so you could just apply these to
> > arm-devs.next, no?
>
> Well, I could, but t
On 28 March 2013 15:15, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.03.2013 12:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Ping!
>
> All patches have at least one Reviewed-by or Acked-by including that of
> the lm32 maintainer, so you could just apply these to arm-devs.next, no?
Well, I could, but they're not really arm pat
Am 28.03.2013 12:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> Ping!
All patches have at least one Reviewed-by or Acked-by including that of
the lm32 maintainer, so you could just apply these to arm-devs.next, no?
Andreas
>
> -- PMM
>
> On 15 March 2013 14:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The functions sysbus_add_
Ping!
-- PMM
On 15 March 2013 14:34, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The functions sysbus_add_memory and sysbus_del_memory are odd wrappers
> around around memory_region_add/del_subregion, and their presence
> is an encouragement to devices to try to map their own memory
> regions into the system address
Il 15/03/2013 17:09, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 15 March 2013 16:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 15/03/2013 15:34, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> I rather suspect sysbus_add_io and sysbus_del_io should also be
>>> removed, but since their users are in PPC and x86 platforms I'll
>>> let somebody
On 15 March 2013 16:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 15/03/2013 15:34, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> I rather suspect sysbus_add_io and sysbus_del_io should also be
>> removed, but since their users are in PPC and x86 platforms I'll
>> let somebody else do that part :-)
>
> sysbus_add_io and sysbus_de
Il 15/03/2013 15:34, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> I rather suspect sysbus_add_io and sysbus_del_io should also be
> removed, but since their users are in PPC and x86 platforms I'll
> let somebody else do that part :-)
sysbus_add_io and sysbus_del_io are actually a good match for the I/O
address spa
The functions sysbus_add_memory and sysbus_del_memory are odd wrappers
around around memory_region_add/del_subregion, and their presence
is an encouragement to devices to try to map their own memory
regions into the system address space.
Since they're only used in a couple of places in the milkymi
11 matches
Mail list logo
