31.01.2016 11:43, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>> 28.01.2016 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think
>>> it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it
>>> negligible compared to the old style
On 31 January 2016 at 08:43, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Maybe what's really needed is a build and test automation tree (and
> associated maintainer)? Peter any comments?
If you want to be the submaintainer for that, be my guest :-)
thanks
-- PMM
Michael Tokarev writes:
> 28.01.2016 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think
>> it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it
>> negligible compared to the old style VM builds at the moment. I
>> suspect this
28.01.2016 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think
> it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it
> negligible compared to the old style VM builds at the moment. I
> suspect this may be because the new infrastruct
Hi,
The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think
it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it
negligible compared to the old style VM builds at the moment. I
suspect this may be because the new infrastructure is under more load
as more projects have migr
