Hello Greg,
I have tried this patchset with my personal email, it seems no error occurs.
And several days ago, I have send patchset successfully.
Maybe it's an accident. It's amazing.
Thanks for your review.
Thanks.
2016-10-13 20:19 GMT+08:00 Greg Kurz :
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:10:17 +0800
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:10:17 +0800
Li Qiang wrote:
> I'm not sure of this, I use
>
> git format-patch -3 -s --subject-prefix="PATCH v3" --cover-letter
>
> to generate this patchset first and then modify some text. Then
>
> git send-email *.patch --to xx --to
>
> Is there anything wrong?
>
T
I'm not sure of this, I use
git format-patch -3 -s --subject-prefix="PATCH v3" --cover-letter
to generate this patchset first and then modify some text. Then
git send-email *.patch --to xx --to
Is there anything wrong?
On 2016-10-13 19:58 GMT+08:00 Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:0
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 03:09:40 -0700
Li Qiang wrote:
> From: Li Qiang
>
> The current xattr implementation in 9pfs has several issues.
>
> -The 'copied_len' in V9fsXattr is used both for accounting bytes and to tag
> the xattr fid.
> -The 'len/copied_len' field in V9fsXattr has a wrong type.
>
From: Li Qiang
The current xattr implementation in 9pfs has several issues.
-The 'copied_len' in V9fsXattr is used both for accounting bytes and to tag the
xattr fid.
-The 'len/copied_len' field in V9fsXattr has a wrong type.
-The read/write dispatch function of xattr uses unsafe computations.
