Peter Maydell writes:
> On 5 March 2015 at 19:24, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> Rejection is also change of behaviour. Because till now, a VM would
>> start with any memory size, even if it's less that 128MB
>> (default_ram_size). With rejection, all those VMs would fail booting
>> displaying the
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Nikunj A Dadhania writes:
>
>> Markus Armbruster writes:
>>
>>> Nikunj A Dadhania writes:
>>>
Current DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE(128MB) enforced by QEMU would not work for
all machines. Introduce a default_ram_size as part of MachineClass.
The below patche
Nikunj A Dadhania writes:
> Markus Armbruster writes:
>
>> Nikunj A Dadhania writes:
>>
>>> Current DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE(128MB) enforced by QEMU would not work for
>>> all machines. Introduce a default_ram_size as part of MachineClass.
>>>
>>> The below patches has following behaviour:
>>>
>>> 1) I
On 5 March 2015 at 19:24, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Rejection is also change of behaviour. Because till now, a VM would
> start with any memory size, even if it's less that 128MB
> (default_ram_size). With rejection, all those VMs would fail booting
> displaying the warning. Is this OK?
No. Not
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Nikunj A Dadhania writes:
>
>> Current DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE(128MB) enforced by QEMU would not work for
>> all machines. Introduce a default_ram_size as part of MachineClass.
>>
>> The below patches has following behaviour:
>>
>> 1) If the user does not provide "-m" option
Nikunj A Dadhania writes:
> Current DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE(128MB) enforced by QEMU would not work for
> all machines. Introduce a default_ram_size as part of MachineClass.
>
> The below patches has following behaviour:
>
> 1) If the user does not provide "-m" option, machine's default ram
>size wil
Current DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE(128MB) enforced by QEMU would not work for
all machines. Introduce a default_ram_size as part of MachineClass.
The below patches has following behaviour:
1) If the user does not provide "-m" option, machine's default ram
size will be picked.
2) In case the user provid