On 05/28/2011 09:51 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 20:27:11 +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 29.04.2011 02:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 28 April 2011 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
-$(addprefix 9pfs/, $(9pfs-nested-y)): CFLAGS += -
On Fri, 27 May 2011 20:27:11 +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 29.04.2011 02:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> > On 28 April 2011 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >>
> >>> -$(addprefix 9pfs/, $(9pfs-nested-y)): CFLAGS += -I$(SRC_PATH)/hw/
> >>
Am 29.04.2011 02:46, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 28 April 2011 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
-$(addprefix 9pfs/, $(9pfs-nested-y)): CFLAGS += -I$(SRC_PATH)/hw/
Wouldn't it be more straight forward to just do QEMU_CFLAGS +=?
Th
On 28 April 2011 21:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> -$(addprefix 9pfs/, $(9pfs-nested-y)): CFLAGS += -I$(SRC_PATH)/hw/
>
> Wouldn't it be more straight forward to just do QEMU_CFLAGS +=?
There aren't any other source files in QEMU which have custom
incl
Am 28.04.2011 22:49, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Commit 353ac78d495ef976242abd868f68d78420861c2c moved the files
without fixing the include paths. It used a modified CFLAGS
to add hw to the include search path, but this breaks builds
where the user wants t
On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Commit 353ac78d495ef976242abd868f68d78420861c2c moved the files
without fixing the include paths. It used a modified CFLAGS
to add hw to the include search path, but this breaks builds
where the user wants to set special CFLAGS. Long include paths
also i
Commit 353ac78d495ef976242abd868f68d78420861c2c moved the files
without fixing the include paths. It used a modified CFLAGS
to add hw to the include search path, but this breaks builds
where the user wants to set special CFLAGS. Long include paths
also increase compilation time.
Therefore this pat
