On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:00 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/16/13 18:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Since commit 23326164 we align access sizes to match the alignment of
> > the address, but we don't align the access size itself. This means we
> > let illegal access sizes (ex. 3) slip through i
On 08/16/13 18:00, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Since commit 23326164 we align access sizes to match the alignment of
> the address, but we don't align the access size itself. This means we
> let illegal access sizes (ex. 3) slip through if the address is
> sufficiently aligned (ex. 4). This results
Since commit 23326164 we align access sizes to match the alignment of
the address, but we don't align the access size itself. This means we
let illegal access sizes (ex. 3) slip through if the address is
sufficiently aligned (ex. 4). This results in an abort which would be
easy for a guest to tri
